Page 656 - The Blue Standard

6th Oct 2015, 6:00 AM
<<First Latest>>
The Blue Standard
Average Rating: 5 (2 votes)
<<First Latest>>

Author Notes:

Newbiespud 6th Oct 2015, 6:00 AM edit delete
Newbiespud
The second panel's dialogue has its roots in a creator in-joke I might as well explain...

When I grab screencaps, I use a file-naming scheme that involves an abbreviated subject, a one-word description, and a number. For most of the mane six, this is pretty simple (TS, AJ, RD, PP, FS)... but from pretty much the beginning, I've always written the full "Rarity" whenever I grab a screencap of her.

As though she'd find the abbreviation tacky and thus would not stand for it.

58 Comments:

ANW 6th Oct 2015, 6:06 AM edit delete reply
"Don't get me wrong, I like my fellow players.
I just don't like it when they _____."
What would you put in the blank?
Me:take all the glory
CrowMagnon 6th Oct 2015, 6:09 AM edit delete reply
"... ask the GM about how to do something that they've done a thousand times before already. (Even though I do it too, occasionally)."
FancyFan 7th Oct 2015, 8:48 PM edit delete reply
This. This so much. We've gone over how the 3.5 magic item pricing system works HOW many times now?
undead_rattler 6th Oct 2015, 6:14 AM edit delete reply
"Argue a DM's ruling. Seriously. HE IS LITERALLY YOUR GOD'S GOD RIGHT NOW, STOP ARGUING >.<"
Kaze Koichi 6th Oct 2015, 7:01 AM edit delete reply
"Argue ANYTHING." We could use this time to, you know, play.
Albedoequals1 6th Oct 2015, 6:17 AM edit delete reply
"...ask the GM if they can do something that they haven't been allowed to do the last hundred times."
Crystalite 6th Oct 2015, 6:18 AM edit delete reply
"Disappear without warning".

Or, alternatively, "Stab me in the back for no apparent reason".
aylatrigger 6th Oct 2015, 6:43 AM edit delete reply
"make the GM look up rules during a battle."

...Though I think we all do that.
Digo 6th Oct 2015, 7:21 AM edit delete reply
Cause unnecessary drama by being a murder-hobo that spills into an OOC argument and then that ends up putting a PC out of commission for the rest of the adventure and has me (as GM) to call them out on being an ice-hole when he then attempts to set ally NPCs on fire, which results in the campaign getting canned.
Digo 6th Oct 2015, 7:31 AM edit delete reply
It's amusing that this has happened three times. I still love my players like siblings. I just think the murderhobo tendencies need to be toned down. ^^;
Evilbob 6th Oct 2015, 8:06 AM edit delete reply
Evilbob
"want to start a new RP, even though we already have four separate campaigns going and unfinished"

You know, finishing the story and getting closure for once is nice, guysssssss.

I can also echo and understand those other sentiments regarding sociopathy and arguing... even if I'm often the one guilty of it that, lol.
aylatrigger 6th Oct 2015, 7:35 PM edit delete reply
Only four? One of my two groups decided to permanently retire a bunch of our campaigns...putting it down to 5.

...And that's just one group.
Digo 7th Oct 2015, 5:03 AM edit delete reply
I used to be bad about that, but I managed to turn around and get campaigns completed. I think there were only two campaigns that I did not finish off by the time the 'ol local gaming group dissolved.
Venseyness 6th Oct 2015, 10:17 AM edit delete reply
"...Keep something from me to make me "surprised," when it would've been better to let me know and weave it into the story."
Specter 6th Oct 2015, 10:32 AM edit delete reply
Specter
"Get mad at me for doing something that somehow screws them over at some point, despite the fact they do that to me, not five minutes ago."

Also, "Act out of character." I question how some people even tolerate those players for their actions.
Digo 6th Oct 2015, 12:22 PM edit delete reply
I generally try not to screw other PCs over, but I dislike when they'll poke fun at my character with a joke, yet take offense if I poke fun back with a joke of equal level. Know what I mean?
Disloyal Subject 6th Oct 2015, 12:53 PM edit delete reply
Disloyal Subject
Eh, why not.
"Charge the enemy I'd just finished sneaking up on."
Leaving survivors once in a while is an option, guys. Or at least letting me get a sneak attack in before starting the bloodbath.
Raxon 6th Oct 2015, 2:07 PM edit delete reply
Raxon
Leave halfway through a session for bad reasons. "Oh! I forgot the season finale of my favorite show is gonna come on! I gotta go, guys!"

I can't be the only one that annoys.
Digo 7th Oct 2015, 5:06 AM edit delete reply
I dislike that too. I don't take it personally when someone doesn't show up at all because they want to see their fav movie, but coming over for just an hour and then bailing suddenly? I'd like warnings so I can plan around that.
Guest 6th Oct 2015, 8:13 PM edit delete reply
"Get in an alignment debate"
Raxon 6th Oct 2015, 9:38 PM edit delete reply
Raxon
I have witnessed an argument when someone wanted to play a chaotic good lawyer.

The group took issue with both chaotic, and good.
Guest 7th Oct 2015, 8:06 PM edit delete reply
because chaotic good is uncontrollable but works towards betterment, you find it impossible? rocks fall, you die(probably. can't kill insanity completely, it seems.).
Guest 6th Oct 2015, 11:25 PM edit delete reply
Make a one-note-joke character in a serious class when everyone else has a character with goals and habits and potential for growth.

Really, our gnome inquisitor makes everyone I know facepalm constantly, she doesn't use any of the inquisitor stuff, and she ALWAYS has to have her way and be the 'funny gal'. Really tempted to have more enemies focus on her soon...
Digo 7th Oct 2015, 5:09 AM edit delete reply
I had a somewhat opposite of that. Mine was the only character that I build a well-rounded backstory, along with short and long term goals. Everyone else was just "There".

Kinda annoying cause if a moment came up to advance my character's long-term goal, it often get inhibited by the others wanting to just go kill and loot a dungeon. :p :3
Guest 6th Oct 2015, 11:30 PM edit delete reply
"get drunk and use the dryer for a toilet"

"Polymorph the bard into a cow again"

"eat all my pizza"
Wrabbit 7th Oct 2015, 9:44 AM edit delete reply
"... play an evil character in a good campaign, screwing over the whole party with the unnecessary drama and trouble."

Seriously, why the artificial tension? I recently played in a game where two of the party members were not only evil, but sacrificing orphans to dark gods in order to gain power/lift a curse, and our lawful good fighter found out through a cleric's divinations. When my kender wizard found out, there were now TWO people who left for moral reasons. Pissed me off, because I was really enjoying playing that kender.
Disloyal Subject 7th Oct 2015, 11:39 PM edit delete reply
Disloyal Subject
I don't get why so many players insist on their Evil characters rocking the boat. Moustache-twirling villainy is not a prerequisite for evil; even the most self-serving scumbag can have reasons for being a team player - perhaps the party is the best hope for saving the world, AKA the place they all live in, or perhaps the evil PC is just genre savvy enough to realize that a group of PCs is a nigh-unstoppable force that it's better to stand with than in front of.
Super Kami Guru 8th Oct 2015, 12:31 AM edit delete reply
@Disloyal. I hear you. Fortunately of the few games I've played so far, the players who were evil aligned actually play for the good of the team. Hell in our current game of pathfinder, we a have 14 year old, half-elf, fighter, psyonic warrior who stands around 4.5 ft tall and wields two full blades. I'll skip the backstory but lets just say it wasn't pretty for her growing up. Now she is borderline sadomasichistic, and actually thoroughly enjoys causing and inflicting pain on someone. However, she can also turn around and walk around in a sun dress without a care in the world. Also, she's very loyal to the group. The character is verrrry surreal sometimes.
EricStarstorm 7th Oct 2015, 12:34 PM edit delete reply
"...complain about combat taking too long, and then proceed to drag on combat with flowery descriptions."
I feel like this is why I can never get a campaign to last for longer than two or three sessions.
Guest 8th Oct 2015, 9:13 PM edit delete reply
Try to talk the GM into giving them an Uzi or a chainsaw. In a fantasy setting.
Sidnoea 6th Oct 2015, 6:32 AM edit delete reply
"would not stand for it"
I see what you did there.
Kaze Koichi 6th Oct 2015, 6:54 AM edit delete reply
For me she always was just R.
Crystalite 6th Oct 2015, 6:56 AM edit delete reply
I use RR.
Albedoequals1 6th Oct 2015, 7:13 AM edit delete reply
If you say "Rarity" really fast, it sounds like "RT" anyway.
Digo 6th Oct 2015, 7:23 AM edit delete reply
Looking at my image files, I write out 'Rarity' as well, but leave initials for the others.
Jannard 6th Oct 2015, 10:39 AM edit delete reply
Makes sense, she's the only one amongst the mane 6 whose name isn't two words or a compound word. It even feels weird to turn it into an acronym.
Desparil 6th Oct 2015, 7:35 AM edit delete reply
Get it right, she's Rarara
Digo 6th Oct 2015, 1:36 PM edit delete reply
How is that pronounced? I keep thinking of it like the Bugs Bunny cheer.
Winged Cat 6th Oct 2015, 12:19 PM edit delete reply
Rarity is most certainly not R-rated. (Unless it's one of those clopfics.)

Though she arrre a good enough pirate, as in a certain set of comics.

Knowing what she thinks of her neighbors Q and S would require defining them, though I think she would settle for Q being Discord (because Discord) and S being Celestia (given the pronunciation).
Disloyal Subject 6th Oct 2015, 10:12 PM edit delete reply
Disloyal Subject
I dunno, she's the first (only, really) to resort to seduction and second only to Rainbow in defaulting to violence as a problem-solver. If any of them were gonna have a rating higher than PG, it'd be her. Well, unless Twilight has any ethically questionable experiments in her basement.

Of course, that's the show characters. FiD is a bit different.
Dusk Raven 17th Dec 2015, 6:11 PM edit delete reply
...Am I the ONLY ONE who abbreviates Rarity as RY?
j-eagle12212012 6th Oct 2015, 7:09 AM edit delete reply
j-eagle12212012
@NewbieSpud

Can I do my spoiler free review today? I have a bunch of stuff going on Thursday so I might not get on ComicFury till Friday...
Erin Palette 6th Oct 2015, 10:06 AM edit delete reply
Erin Palette
I'm switching from "watermelon cantaloupe" to "rainwater hurricane" for my simulated crowd noise.
Toric 6th Oct 2015, 1:58 PM edit delete reply
Why is it the watermelon can't elope exactly?
ANW 7th Oct 2015, 3:36 AM edit delete reply
Even Pinkie Pie took damage from that bad pun.
Digo 7th Oct 2015, 5:10 AM edit delete reply
Hahaha, I approve.
Philadelphus 6th Oct 2015, 10:33 AM edit delete reply
Philadelphus
Aww, that's kinda sweet of Dash's player—assuming Applejack would clean house against anyone other than RD.
Boris Carlot 6th Oct 2015, 11:28 AM edit delete reply
Well, she *IS* a PC. PCs tend to kick the ass of the average NPC schlub. Even Fluttershy would probably do better than most :p
Winged Cat 6th Oct 2015, 12:24 PM edit delete reply
You don't even need that. RD in this game has a kind of "I am the only one allowed to defeat you" toward AJ, so this is pure IC reaction.

(Though yes. One could view Fluttershy vs. Iron Will through this lens.)

That said, do I sense a derail coming on?
Disloyal Subject 6th Oct 2015, 12:51 PM edit delete reply
Disloyal Subject
I believe the derail has already begun.
recentteen14 6th Oct 2015, 12:07 PM edit delete reply
Personally, I always liked a 'Rare' abb. for her- seeing an RT abb. always makes me think they're talking about me at first, kinda gets weird fast.
Digo 6th Oct 2015, 12:21 PM edit delete reply
At first I thought "RT" was some kind of internet joke abbreviating Rainbow Dash with something else.
Disloyal Subject 6th Oct 2015, 12:50 PM edit delete reply
Disloyal Subject
I was guessing that at first too. Then I wondered if Rooster Teeth was somehow involved.
The explanation got a chuckle out of me.
Mykin 6th Oct 2015, 2:39 PM edit delete reply
Mykin
That last panel. How many times have I elicited that response from my DM, either out loud or in thought, when I try to figure out as much details as possible about the world I'm playing in and about the situation I'm currently in. Hey, I put a good amount of points into those knowledge skills! I want to make good use of them!

I do still feel bad though, especially since this particular DM I'm referring to prefers to make stuff off the top of his head rather than rely on any kind of notes.
Edgewalker_001 7th Oct 2015, 4:02 AM edit delete reply
I always put points into knowledge skills. I'm pretty sure that even if I played a fighter, I'd have more points in knowledges than in parry... =p

Then again, the only melee character I've played in the last year went up against an Otyugh and failed to even damage it... I knew I should've just cast magic missile, since he was a spellsword.
Rooker 7th Oct 2015, 2:59 AM edit delete reply
"Just one more check!" I've learned to just let him keep trying until he gets himself or somebody else killed by frustrating the villains with his incessant defiance. I've also given him a maximum of two extra checks in one scene to keep him from crippling the story and everyone else's focus.
ANW 7th Oct 2015, 3:40 AM edit delete reply
When I do the two letter short thing, it was always RA or RT for me.