Page 133 - Loose Dead Ends

12th Jun 2012, 6:00 AM
Loose Dead Ends
Average Rating: 5 (1 votes)
<<First Latest>>

Author Notes:

Newbiespud 12th Jun 2012, 6:00 AM edit delete
Newbiespud
You see that banner/title image at the top of the page? This is what it looks like right now:
image

I want something a little better than what I have, but I have absolutely zero graphic design chops. So I'm looking for an artist again. If you're interested in doing some logo art for the site, contact me at spud@spudlink.net.
Newbiespud 12th Jun 2012, 4:09 PM edit delete
Newbiespud
I got a pretty large response for this. Thanks, all of you - the artist problem is pretty much solved now. You'll see the fruits of their labor soon enough.

96 Comments:

darkwulf23 12th Jun 2012, 6:02 AM edit delete reply
darkwulf23
Gotta be a little bit more forceful that that Fluttershy
BadHorse 12th Jun 2012, 11:46 AM edit delete reply
Won't listen to my worries?

Bury bodies in a hurry!
legomaster00156 12th Jun 2012, 6:16 AM edit delete reply
Twilight... dragons are not beasts...
Zuche 12th Jun 2012, 6:25 AM edit delete reply
Nor are they priests.

Some of them could count as conflagrations, however.
Inke Swirle 12th Jun 2012, 6:41 AM edit delete reply
>Nor are they priests.
You obviously haven't met the right dragons.
Zarhon 12th Jun 2012, 7:56 AM edit delete reply
Zarhon
Clearly you haven't brushed up on your dragon/star-bear lore.

1d4chan.org/wiki/Bear_Lore

Cain 18th Jun 2012, 10:29 PM edit delete reply
Cain
I visit 1d4chan for the 40k stuff. Space Marine guidelines and the 666 rites are interesting
Zuche 12th Jun 2012, 9:17 AM edit delete reply
There are no right dragons. There are those who see you as a snack, and those who see you as a playing piece.
Rowja 12th Jun 2012, 6:27 AM edit delete reply
Eh, she's new. She'll learn.
Oblivious 12th Jun 2012, 7:04 AM edit delete reply
Oblivious
Regardless, FS still has the best Diplomacy and Intimidate. They'd be fools not to bring her along, whether she wants to or not. Though, I am wondering where her +2 to Diplomacy and Intimidate are coming from... not sure what background benefit does that.
Zarhon 12th Jun 2012, 8:37 AM edit delete reply
Zarhon
Clearly it's from her part-time job: "Bear chiropractic". Her clients must have been very chatty.

Oblivious 12th Jun 2012, 10:38 AM edit delete reply
Oblivious
Good point, Zarhon. I'd imagine she would get a bonus to intimidate for bear-wrestling. She and Zangief should be tag-team partners. Someone make this happen!
Thousand Year Sunrise 12th Jun 2012, 6:22 AM edit delete reply
Ooh, I'm absolutely going to- I believe the expression is "Tap dat logo." Verily.
Umiyuri Papaeyra 12th Jun 2012, 6:51 AM edit delete reply
Umiyuri Papaeyra
I didn't know you had a logo fetish, Thousand-Year Sunrise!

*GIGGLE*
Digo 12th Jun 2012, 7:10 AM edit delete reply
Can logos be Rule-34'd? O_o
MirrorImage 12th Jun 2012, 7:19 AM edit delete reply
MirrorImage
Unfortunately, yes...

*buh...*
Demonu 12th Jun 2012, 7:20 AM edit delete reply
Demonu
Yes.
Yes, they can.

God bless your innocent soul.
Zarhon 12th Jun 2012, 7:54 AM edit delete reply
Zarhon
Better make sure you turn your filters on before you check your mail then Spud. :p

Speaking of which, the current logo fits the comic's theme, but it's barely readable from it's font.
Thousand Year Sunrise 12th Jun 2012, 8:34 AM edit delete reply
Baby, I'll increase your legibility. I'm gonna use all my special fonts, and maybe invent a couple new ones, until we find something that makes you sing. Oh yeah.
Umiyuri Papaeyra 12th Jun 2012, 8:52 AM edit delete reply
Umiyuri Papaeyra
Who knew an extraordinarily long-lasting incarnation of a phenomenon caused by light particles from a star and the rotation of the planet could be so flirty?

*GIGGLE*
Thousand Year Sunrise 12th Jun 2012, 9:57 AM edit delete reply
Umiyuri, That's what makes me so much scarier than you. You think that the moon from that one Zelda game is scary? Cross that with the Eye of Sauron. Your humanized Pinkie Pie ain't nothing compared to that.
Demonu 12th Jun 2012, 10:02 AM edit delete reply
Demonu
That pretty much just makes it a giant eye in the sky which isn't very scary.

Or else a grinning moon with just one eye. Again, not very scary. And before you argue, cyclopses aren't scary because of their one eye, they're scary because they're monsters that would eat you when given the chance.
Digo 12th Jun 2012, 1:05 PM edit delete reply
Though their lack of depth perception can make it hard to grab a victim. :3
gindranis 13th Jun 2012, 3:47 AM edit delete reply
Everything can be r34'd, this means that there is already porn of you, me, that logo.
the only thing that's immune is ponies, but that is only if you have a selective perception and can instantly blot out anything you don't want to exist from your reality.
Oblivious 12th Jun 2012, 10:13 AM edit delete reply
Oblivious
Gotta disagree, TYS. I think Umi's humanized Pinkie is scarier, though only just. That moon gives me nightmares...
kriss1989 12th Jun 2012, 11:05 AM edit delete reply
kriss1989
Wait, people were scared of the moon? lol
Oblivious 12th Jun 2012, 11:09 AM edit delete reply
Oblivious
Talking about the moon from Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask; moon has a very creepy looking "it's raping time face".
Izandai 12th Jun 2012, 12:10 PM edit delete reply
And when you're starting to run out of time and it starts to get really big, it's a creepy reminder of "OHSHIT GOTTA GO FAST!"
Umiyuri Papaeyra 12th Jun 2012, 1:44 PM edit delete reply
Umiyuri Papaeyra
GOTTA GO FASTER FASTER FASTERFASTER SONIC X
Zarhon 12th Jun 2012, 2:08 PM edit delete reply
Zarhon
Pfft, the moon is hardly scary. Majora's mask itself is much scarier, just on account of it's huge, staring, crazy eyes.

www.zeldainformer.com/2012/03/20/Majora%27s%20Mask.jpg

In fact, almost every scary picture of a psycho is pretty much focused on the eyes (and the grin). Especially when you can see the exact state of insanity in said eye, from it's pupils, blood vessels and such.


Case in point (WARNING - contains terrifying pink pony nightmares):
tinyurl.com/cljq27n
tinyurl.com/d8fay5q
tinyurl.com/7dvqo3k


Bronymous 12th Jun 2012, 3:08 PM edit delete reply
Bronymous
Those are cute pics. I have to say, this is a pointless discussion, as neither of these things are scary enough to warrant the time spent discussing them.

I should know, I've been on the Internet.
Starhunter 14th Jun 2012, 12:58 AM edit delete reply
Twilight's Rape FAce is creepier.
Raxon 22nd Jun 2012, 3:11 AM edit delete reply
Raxon
I have lurked on bay12, where mermaids are captured so that their children may be harvested for bones. There are terrifying things on the internet. Weep and despair, for I bring unto you a true cosmic horror of the abyss! MWAHAHAHA!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZpurerF2HM&feature=topics
Bronymous 12th Jun 2012, 6:26 AM edit delete reply
Bronymous
This is the closest to the top of the page I've ever been.

What is the deal with Angel in panel 7. Is he posing? Is that the DM posing in response to AJ? Because he looks pretty "come at me, bro".
Zeeth 13th Jun 2012, 6:20 AM edit delete reply
I think that shot is from the time he smacked Fluttershy's butt.
Bronymous 13th Jun 2012, 12:15 PM edit delete reply
Bronymous
No, he's on top of Spike stomping on his head.
Guest 12th Jun 2012, 6:58 AM edit delete reply
I remember the time my friend tried to be "as dragon" as possible without actually being a dragon in dnd 3.5.

In one case he convinced the dm to let him be a dragonborn and half-dragon at the same time.

In a less ridiculous case he was a prismatic dragon-wrought kobold, which is known for cheesing sorcerer levels, but all he wanted to do was fly around and hit people, so it was allowed.

It was hilarious when he acted out his fly-by attacks with a high squeaky voice.
*eeeeeeeeeyah!*
Techno 12th Jun 2012, 7:01 AM edit delete reply
I'm close to the top! woo!
Also, if they need to convince a DRAGON, wouldn't Spike be more helpful? He actually is one.
Digo 12th Jun 2012, 7:13 AM edit delete reply
Well... that might end up feeling like using a child to convince an adult to do something. Chances of success may be iffy.
Demonu 12th Jun 2012, 7:22 AM edit delete reply
Demonu
Really?
Because using a (small) child as leverage usually yields favourable results for me. Of course, it depends on the person in question but overall, favourable results.
Bronymous 12th Jun 2012, 7:30 AM edit delete reply
Bronymous
I find that most people are willing to do anything a child asks, so long as the child makes it known they will be severely beaten if it doesn't happen.

Apparently it also works in DnD.
Zarhon 12th Jun 2012, 7:50 AM edit delete reply
Zarhon
Nah, Spike almost got killed/beaten for eating a gem of another adult dragon in another cave.

Having him ask a dragon that's trying to sleep to move / stop sleeping would be the equivalent of having Dennis the Meanace harass Mr. Wilson.
Zuche 12th Jun 2012, 9:29 AM edit delete reply
I find children too yielding to make good levers. Are you supposed to freeze them or coat them in molten iron first or something?
Digo 12th Jun 2012, 1:07 PM edit delete reply
Could try bronzing them in their shoes?
Oblivious 12th Jun 2012, 7:55 AM edit delete reply
Oblivious
We've had the opposite effect in our campaigns; any time children have been involved in our campaign, it has ended very poorly especially for the children. Hell, that's half the reason one of our groups fell apart, since one of the players was a child-hating scumbag, and acted on that in the game. For example, the DM used a street urchin as an adventure hook, which we all unanimously elected to ignore. Now, I'm no fan of children, but you won't see me drop-kicking a kid for no good reason, especially one who has already been battered and beaten. Morality aside, this stunt brought the town guard about, and even the Neutral Evil guy in the party was like, "WTF, man?" (in character, no less). This isn't even the worst story about that campaign and child violence, just the only funny one.
Zarhon 12th Jun 2012, 8:07 AM edit delete reply
Zarhon
At least he didn't suplex the child.

As for the other stories, let me guess: Burned orphanages, child slavery, monster feed?
Demonu 12th Jun 2012, 10:04 AM edit delete reply
Demonu
Though in all fairness, the orphanage made the first attack.
Bronymous 12th Jun 2012, 3:11 PM edit delete reply
Bronymous
Ooh ooh, Child Slavery, Child Slavery! I do that one a lot. You don't even really have to have a reason, you just say "We execute the villagers, but keep one or two of the children alive to watch us burn the bodies."

Now ask me how I can get away with this when every other player is Good- especially the Paladin.
Zuche 12th Jun 2012, 9:39 AM edit delete reply
At first, I'd wonder if your campaign was run by Joe Straczynski. Then it turns out you had someone who just hated the competition.
Oblivious 12th Jun 2012, 8:25 AM edit delete reply
Oblivious
Yes, on all counts, though the child slavery thing was implied, and to be fair, we weren't the cause...that time, and a couple that were worse... I'm gonna need a moment to type the story out and give it context, otherwise, you won't fully appreciate this, and why the group eventually came to blows over this... *grabs smoking jacket, fez, pipe, and whiskey glass, and turns on record player*
Oblivious 12th Jun 2012, 9:15 AM edit delete reply
Oblivious
All right, story time! So this was a third edition campaign was an odd bunch (quite the feat considering we had an NPC half-orc rogue in this campaign named McGiggles).

Party setup was a dwarf rogue, elf fighter, half-orc cleric, halfling wizard, and human barbarian and paladin (paladin being me), with everyone being some iteration of neutral, except for me and the dwarf, who are Lawful Good and Neutral Evil respectively. The alignments thankfully weren't a problem, so much as the people, and by people, I mean the barbarian, who used his chaotic natural to justify crazy stuff. It's be like if you gave the The Ultimate Warrior of WWF fame leather armor, a battleaxe, and more brain damage. Paranoid, crazy, and uninhibited are not a good combination, especially after one of your first acts in adventuring is burning a village, starting with the orphanage, to the ground (to be fair, it was an accident). Being the moral compass of the party, I at least tried to keep us from being completely irredeemable, saving some of the kids and evacuating the rest of the villagers. Believe it or not, we made money for saving the citizens, even though, the whole reason the village burned was because we were trying to stop a bandit leader hiding in the orphanage (hence the burning; he started it, just our barbarian made it worse). Plus, it was all in character, so no one was mad...yet.

Cut to a few weeks later, and we're still causing mayhem across the countryside, with me doing my best to stay a good guy, despite being a wanted criminal; I think the justification was I couldn't uphold the justice and purity and all that rot if I was dead. Anyway, the guy playing the barbarian starts becoming more active in his craziness, leading to all kinds of horrible thing happening to children, regardless of race or circumstance. It wasn't completely out of nowhere, since he was nearly possessed by a demon who started off disguised as a child; it wasn't completely without merit, but even a paladin's patience and understanding can only go so far. Got to a point where the characters came to blows about it, concerning past and current dilemmas, leading to some great role playing, was still in good fun... and we ran into the surviving children from the orphanage in the beginning.

Bandit leader was back with a vengeance, so we decided to end this before he became a recurring bad guy. Killed him, saved the kids, was going to bring 'em to the next town over three days away. Well, I was nearly killed in the fight, so my paladin was unconscious from the blood loss (roleplaying again, passed out due to overexertion), but really it was a setup for me to duck out for an hour; some family business. Came back to hear that we had "taken care" of the children, and by that, I mean the barbarian traded the children to his tribe for better weapons and armor, since our party bumped into them as a random encounter. I was a little mad that he did that, not because he used them for bartering purposes, so much as he did it behind my back just because I'm LG, and he didn't want to hear my mouth about it, roleplaying or not. That's when the OOC fighting started, and he became a child-beating psycho just to spite me, in and out of character. He was forcibly changed to Chaotic Evil shortly after (level loss and all). I think the only reason the DM and party didn't stop us was because they didn't think it could get worse, so they were enjoying the show. Which leads us to the child drop-kicking... Even I had to admit was funny after the fact, but we had just gotten the bounties on our heads taken off so we could be in a civilized area again, and then he kills a beat-up kid with a natural 20 unarmed strike, which gets us wanted...again. Campaign fell apart two sessions after that due to our butting heads. I'm not saying either of us were right or wrong; could have been handled better on both sides. Just seems to be a running theme that kids don't do well in our campaigns, which is probably why they never show up anymore, thanks to the DM.
Oblivious 12th Jun 2012, 7:11 AM edit delete reply
Oblivious
This isn't going to end well. I figure Angel's either going to let everything go to crap, or he's going to rule with an iron fist... erm, paw.
Zarhon 12th Jun 2012, 8:03 AM edit delete reply
Zarhon
And then he'll make an example of Spike by breaking his legs.

youtu.be/6FjMQBN2Ls8?hd=1&t=3m54s
Masterweaver 12th Jun 2012, 7:53 AM edit delete reply
Fluttershy, if you stay behind you won't have anypony to role play with!

On the logo, how about a d20 that came up Pony?
Zarhon 12th Jun 2012, 8:05 AM edit delete reply
Zarhon
Or d20 with twilight's cutie mark instead of a 20?

Or a Pinkie Pie d20.
Bronymous 12th Jun 2012, 3:13 PM edit delete reply
Bronymous
Or a Pony with a d20 as a cutie mark?

Or a d12, so as to be original?

Or just change that font so we can read it.
Mordenheim 12th Jun 2012, 9:31 PM edit delete reply
Like this little lady?

Meet Bouncing Betty:

https://t.facdn.net/7287005@400-1327546925.jpg
Mordenheim 12th Jun 2012, 9:44 PM edit delete reply
Mordenheim
Sorry for that, here's a better image if this works...

image
Karilyn 13th Jun 2012, 3:08 AM edit delete reply
Karilyn
Holy crap, I had no idea these comment fields permitted the posting of images. I had just assumed it would strip tags.
Zeeth 13th Jun 2012, 6:24 AM edit delete reply
Huzzah for BBcode!
Bronymous 13th Jun 2012, 12:16 PM edit delete reply
Bronymous
Well, now someone needs to tell us how to do that so we can all stop posting links.
xuincherguixe 13th Jun 2012, 11:28 PM edit delete reply
xuincherguixe
I had kind of given up on getting that stuff working.
image

(Couldn't find a good pony image, and I really should be working and thus didn't make my own. Sorry.)

I'd also link to a tutorial on using it, but it can vary. But here seems like a good place to start.
Dragonflight 12th Jun 2012, 8:12 AM edit delete reply
What about redoing the logo in the actual MLP font style? Complete with background art?

It just occurred to me, when looking at Zarhon's sig image... that picture of Twilight looks like she's eating a sandwich. Very disturbing. :)
Digo 12th Jun 2012, 1:09 PM edit delete reply
I thought she was eating the book O_o
Zarhon 12th Jun 2012, 1:49 PM edit delete reply
Zarhon
She is.

fav.me/d4wbm1q
Lyntermas 12th Jun 2012, 8:25 AM edit delete reply
Lyntermas
Sigh...Fluttershy, if you want to use an excuse, you gotta be UNREASONABLE about it. Accepting a rational solution presented by your friends just isn't gonna cut it. You got to whine like a little child until they decide it's less trouble overall to let you have your way.
Zarhon 12th Jun 2012, 8:34 AM edit delete reply
Zarhon
That's Rarity's job.
Chris 12th Jun 2012, 9:14 AM edit delete reply
I've occasionally had players try to pull something like this, where they want to join the army or become blacksmiths or work as vets or what have you instead of adventuring. I usually let them. I've found that after spending a session or two sitting around watching everyone else play with an occasional "roll a d20. Okay, you earn two copper for forging horseshoes today" thrown their way, they find a way to bring their character motivations in line with a career that involves regularly going out on adventures.
kriss1989 12th Jun 2012, 11:21 AM edit delete reply
kriss1989
And then there is me, with the actual rules on how to run a business from the DMG2 in 3.5 which included encounter tables involving bandits, disasters, competitors, wandering monsters, magical accidents, disguised bandits pretending to be wounded adventurers, and shapeshifted dragon patrons. I had more fun running my bar that week (I negotiated for an upgrade IC and had to deal with a rampaging rhino that escaped from the circus) than the party did on that dungeon run which was made when the DM decided to do a puzzle based dungeon with "easy ones". They got through three puzzles, eight rooms, one combat encounter that night. I got a combat encounter, NPC interaction, role-playing, and not having to figure out a logic math puzzle that it turns out the DM messed up on (discovered in hour two of that puzzle) and let you through to the next puzzle door. The DM didn't want to focus on me much so that I'd feel left out, but I spent my 'off' time grinding up my Pokemon Sapphire team to fight the elite four. I had a lot of fun.
JR Klein 12th Jun 2012, 4:57 PM edit delete reply
That does indeed sound like a lot of fun. :D
Chris 12th Jun 2012, 10:00 PM edit delete reply
Personally, I'd be willing to do something like that--and have, on occasion--but only if the player is willing to schedule a one-on-one session to rp their bar-running experience (or whatever). I have a strict "Your individual stuff can't result in the rest of the party sitting around listening to the two of us chat and roll dice for more than a couple of minutes at a stretch" policy, which I've found most players heartily approve of. Even the guys who <i>love</i> going off and doing their own thing usually recognize that everyone else can't be sitting on their hands indefinitely.
Stairc 12th Jun 2012, 9:34 AM edit delete reply
Stairc
Hey everyone, I've finally made my selection for next week's MLP adventure. I have to say, you guys didn't make it easy for me - I got so many fantastic applications it was nigh-impossible to narrow it down to four. Finally though I bit the bullet and I'll be writing a letter to Celestia to tell her what I learned.

The lucky adventurers this time around are...

Karilyn
Ranubis
Dragryphon
Oblivious


Hopefully it'll go well so we can run another. Celebrate good times folks! I'm sure we'll be telling you all about how it goes in a future comment-section.
Oblivious 12th Jun 2012, 10:03 AM edit delete reply
Oblivious
So let the fails begin? :P
Stairc 12th Jun 2012, 12:10 PM edit delete reply
Stairc
Possibly. However, as most of you already have your cutie-marks - I'm not sure the Unknown Ponies system fits as well as otherwise. I also don't understand it on the gameplay-level. I get the overall themes and what the mechanics are there for, but I'm having trouble figuring out the core stats and how they factor into things.

I definitely like the friendship track, that's a great concept and system.

I'm not sure if the encouraging of failure is going to lead to good gameplay though. I like empowering the players by rewarding creative problem-solving rather than their skill-checks, sure, but here the system seems to give incentives to failure. I like players knowing that if they work hard and come up with a great plan, they've got a great chance. I could apply heavy DM modifiers in response to good planning, but that negates the point of the system to begin with. Plus, it makes players kind of want to fail... Which might hurt their planning.

I feel like I'm missing something. I think I'll see if I can ask Erin herself. Or, if anyone's tried the system, it'd be great to hear from you too. You can email me at minimallyexceptional@gmail.com

=)
Karilyn 12th Jun 2012, 12:29 PM edit delete reply
Karilyn
From what I understand about the system, the Friendship Track is sort of a counterbalance to the high failure rate of rolls.

Essentially, you can uses your Generosity, Laughter, Honesty, Loyalty, and Kindness points to "purchase" successful events in each of the categories (more powerful with the more points you spend) without needing to roll the dice (with GM approval of course).

And you can push it even harder with the Magic track, by forcing a roll to improve itself, thus allowing you, if you have 2 magic points, guarantee a minimum of a successful roll, and more likely a critical success.

So it sorta creates this metagame of collecting points to guarantee you can't fail a roll in an environment where you normally fail rolls.

At least that's what I think Erin was intending.
Stairc 12th Jun 2012, 1:55 PM edit delete reply
Stairc
That's a really good point. I liked the friendship tracks already, but I didn't factor in their counterbalance to the high-failure rolls. I guess the only worry would then be that the meta-game of collecting those points begins to consume the actual game.

Player 1: Okay, are we ready to go to the wedding guys?

Player 2: Sure! But first, I check to see if there are any kids on the streets.

DM: Sure, you can find some.

Player 2: Do any look sad?

DM: Um... One does off in a corner. A blue filly watching a group of others play hoof-scotch.

Player 3: Great! Let's go comfort her.

DM: Okay, what do you say?

Player 1: Um, the wedding sounds interesting - there might even be some danger to the princess.

Player 2: Yeah, so we better have our friendship points. We'll tell the kid, 'cheer up, just believe in yourself and you can be great'.

DM: Okay, that'll get you a friendship--

Player 3: Wait! Stop.

Player 1: Thank goodness...

Player 3: Will we get extra points if we do it in song?

Player 2: Yeah! Great idea!

DM: Well, I suppose...

Player 3: Actually, let's throw a party for the kid, the rules say that's worth about 3 points!

DM: You... Could do that


*laughs* Actually, a completely open-ended sandbox good deeds session sounds pretty fun. Just trying to figure out how to cheer people up and making friendship points the rewards instead of experience. I could definitely get behind that. If the meta-game becomes the main game that could be really fun. I might have to play around with that...

Any thoughts?
Zarhon 12th Jun 2012, 2:25 PM edit delete reply
Zarhon
I can already see the players fighting each other over good deeds, terrorizing the NPCs with their ever-increasing friendship attempts and/or endangering the town with their over-the-top antics.

PC1: Do we have everything?

PC2: Yep! Ten pounds of explosives, 5000 bits worth of gem dust, fire-leaves, enchanted +15 cannon, portable holes, one of Discord's shapeshifting nail clippings, a tuft of Pinkie Pie's mane hair, 20 bits worth of parchment, one written document ensuring the royal presence of the Princess, and some sprinkles.

PC3: Make sure to fireproof everything as well. We can't risk it burning up in the atmosphere.

DM: ...All this for a party invitation?
Stairc 12th Jun 2012, 4:19 PM edit delete reply
Stairc
Amazing. This is a party worthy of Pinkie Pie.

I talked to Erin, the wonderful and talented creator of the system, and she confirmed some of my concerns about the constant-failure getting frustrating and the game system being prone to tangents. However, she offered a lot of great suggestions on how to manage the chaos. I'll definitely be using some variation of her system, and I can promise something similar to the friendship track will be in place. I love that thing.
Karilyn 12th Jun 2012, 12:23 PM edit delete reply
Karilyn
This should be fun I hope ^^;
Stairc 12th Jun 2012, 1:56 PM edit delete reply
Stairc
Me too. I can't let Newbiespud down after he said such nice things about my to Bronymous. :)
Bronymous 12th Jun 2012, 3:20 PM edit delete reply
Bronymous
Kinda glad I didn't send in that application. I was hoping for a game where I play an adult dealing with a bunch of kids, but it sounds like everyone had that same idea.

I may just roll up a kid, just to shake it up a bit (and by shake it up, I mean actually attempt one of the game's intended main objectives).
Stairc 12th Jun 2012, 5:21 PM edit delete reply
Stairc
Were you admitted Bronymous? I kind of lost track of most peoples' usernames. Or did you not apply and are thinking of applying now/next time?

I'm rather confused.
Bronymous 12th Jun 2012, 5:41 PM edit delete reply
Bronymous
I was going to at first, but between scheduling and the amount of interest I figured I'd wait it out. I can send in a standing application if you want, and if in the future you find yourself in need of a fourth player I can jump in.

The same goes for Erin or anyone else who may be running a game.
Stairc 13th Jun 2012, 1:47 AM edit delete reply
Stairc
Well, feel free. I'm definitely going to prioritize people who did send in before the deadline for filling in for anyone though - for the first mini-campaign I mean. It's only fair. =)
Bronymous 13th Jun 2012, 12:18 PM edit delete reply
Bronymous
Of course. I meant in the future when more people have had a turn and you're short a player.
Oblivious 12th Jun 2012, 1:16 PM edit delete reply
Oblivious
Oh, I wasn't talking about using the Unknown Ponies system; I just meant that I have some legendarily bad dice rolls, second only only of my buddies who managed to get six natural 1's in a row (man, did we laugh at that, much to his chagrin).
Oblivious 12th Jun 2012, 1:34 PM edit delete reply
Oblivious
Of course, failing can win too; for example, one of my favorite spectacular fails had me failing at a stealth roll while on the roof of a chapel. For one, it was a natural one, so it was an automatic fail, secondly, this was my second 4th edition attempt, and I was playing a Minotaur ranger, trying to stealth my way into the roof of a church where the main bad guy was hiding out. I realize how ridiculous it is for a Minotaur to try to stealth, but just go with it. Anyway, I not only failed at the stealth roll, but also the Athletics roll right before that, so I fell through the ceiling, crashing through to the basement, and based on the DM's percentile roll to figure out where I landed, I end up turning the main bad guy into a pancake, as well, as the two guys flanking him. Granted, the fall took me down to 1/4 HP, but it was worth it to hear the DM utter the phase, "Death by ass-crushing; that's a new one in my campaigns."
Zuche 13th Jun 2012, 10:19 AM edit delete reply
I made the mistake of reading that last line just as I had to answer a phone in work. Nearly lost it in the middle of speaking.
Azureink 13th Jun 2012, 8:01 AM edit delete reply
Azureink
Next time Gadg-Stairc. Next time!
L-Ganon 12th Jun 2012, 12:18 PM edit delete reply
For a logo I'd suggest a d12 from the side (at the right angle you have 6 faces visible with those pentagon faced ones) and each of the mane six's cutie mark instead of each number. I suppose you could get away with using a D20 if you use... I was about to suggest the CMC's cutie marks but then remembered the obvious... if you use some other characters from the show that crop up. Then you just have "Friendship is Dragons" circling it like a coin.
I'd do it myself, but I'm also terrible at art.
L-Ganon 12th Jun 2012, 12:28 PM edit delete reply
Just spotted Masterweaver and Zarhon already along the same lines.
Crimson Doom 12th Jun 2012, 12:52 PM edit delete reply
Crimson Doom
I seem to be alone on this one, but I much prefer the current logo. It looks really freaking cool already, no need to improve on it. Still, your comic so your choice, Newbiespud.
Umiyuri Papaeyra 12th Jun 2012, 1:57 PM edit delete reply
Umiyuri Papaeyra
From a serious, designer's point of view (no mad giggling in this comment) the logo is pretty poor, and the main reason is the typeface being used. The individual letters aren't that discernible, making it hard to read the logo as a whole, and stepping back from it you notice that the entire thing basically forms one big red block - so it's not that recognisable overall. The typeface sort of fits, in that it's from the medieval era and that's generally what D&D is stereotyped to be set in (and what the tech level of Equestria is apparently meant to be), but it's not used the way that kind of type was used at the time, either.
Bronymous 12th Jun 2012, 3:22 PM edit delete reply
Bronymous
Says that new face. Still not scary.
Crimson Doom 13th Jun 2012, 5:15 AM edit delete reply
Crimson Doom
*shrugs* Not being any sort of professional designer, I can only reply that regardless, it still looks cool. Hopefully whatever the new one is will still look as cool.
Kapten-N 14th Jul 2012, 11:07 AM edit delete reply
I had never noticed before that the Ponyville background is actually darker in this episode due to the smoke.